JVAS announces awards - Four best research articles (one each from basic, production, para-clinical and clinical subjects) and one best short communication will be adjudged for awards each year!!!

Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences

Volume: 56 Issue: 2

  • Open Access
  • Research Article

Aflatoxin B1 detoxification potential of viable and killed Lactobacillus rhamnosus by in vitro method

P. Ayana1, K. S. Ajith1*, K. Ally1, M. T. Dipu2, Deepa Anand1 and Binoj Chacko3

1Department of Animal Nutrition, College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Mannuthy, Thrissur, 2Cattle Breeding Farm,
Thumburmuzhy, 3Department of Poultry Science, College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Mannuthy, Thrissur, Kerala
Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Pookode, Wayanad, Kerala

Year: 2025, Page: 343-347, Doi: https://doi.org/10.51966/jvas.2025.56.2.343-347

Received: Feb. 24, 2025 Accepted: April 25, 2025 Published: June 30, 2025

Abstract

Aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) is a potent mycotoxin produced by Aspergillus flavus and related fungi, posing severe health risks to humans and animals. This study evaluated the aflatoxin detoxification ability of viable and killed Lactobacillus rhamnosus using an in vitro binding assay. Five experimental groups were included: Treatment 1 contained viable L. rhamnosus with poultry layer feed adjusted to 30 ppb AFB1 by adding contaminated maize, while treatment 2 used killed L. rhamnosus under the same conditions. A positive control was maintained with 30 ppb AFB1 alone. Two negative controls were prepared using feed with naturally occurring AFB1 (concentration determined after preparation) and supplemented with either viable or killed L. rhamnosus. AFB1 levels were quantified at 3h and 6h post-treatment using ultra-highperformance liquid chromatography (UHPLC) following immunoaffinity column (IAC) cleanup. Statistical analysis was performed using RMANOVA and one-sample t-tests. The results demonstrated a significant reduction in AFB1 levels in the presence of both viable and killed L. rhamnosus. AFB1 reduction ranged from 24.4% to 28.2% in Treatment 1 and Treatment 2, while in the negative controls, the reduction was between 16.7% and 17.8%. These findings highlight the potential application of L. rhamnosus in aflatoxin detoxification strategies, particularly for improving feed safety in the poultry industry.

Keywords: Aflatoxin B1, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, in vitro, UHPLC

References

Alberts, J., Engelbrecht, Y., Steyn, P., Holzapfel, W. and Vanzyl, W. 2006. Biological degradation of aflatoxin B1 by Rhodococcus erythropolis cultures. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 109: 121–126.

Becha, B.B. and Devi, S.S., 2013. Aflatoxin levels in feeds and feed ingredients of livestock and poultry in Kerala. J. Vet. Med. Anim. Sci. 44: 76-78.

BIS [Bureau of Indian Standards]. 2007. Poultry Feeds – specification IS: 1374: 2007, Fifth revision. Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi, India. 5p.

Bueno, D.J., Casale, C.H., Pizzolitto, R.P., Salvano, M.A. and Oliver, G. 2007. Physical adsorption of aflatoxin B1 by lactic acid bacteria and Saccharomyces cerevisiae: A Theoretical Model. J. Food Prot. 70: 2148–2154.

Darsanaki, R.K., Kolavani, M.H., Chakoosari, M.M.D., Shalkeh, E. and Tajehmiri, A. 2014. Biological control of aflatoxin B1 by probiotic bacteria. Trends Life Sci3: 2319-4731.

El-Nezami, Kankaanpaa, P., Salminen, S. and Ahokas, J. 1998. Ability of dairy strains of lactic acid bacteria to bind a common food carcinogen, aflatoxin B1. Food Chem. Toxicol. 36: 321-326.

El-Nezami, H., Mykkänen, H., Kankaanpää, P., Salminen, S. and Ahokas, J. 2000. Ability of Lactobacillus and Propionibacterium strains to remove aflatoxin b1 from the chicken duodenum. J. Food Prot. 63: 549–552.

Gruber-Dorninger, C., Jenkins, T. and Schatzmayr, G. 2019. Global mycotoxin occurrence in feed: A ten-year survey. Toxins. 11(7):375.

Haskard, C., Binnion, C. and Ahokas, J. 2000. Factors affecting the sequestration of aflatoxin by Lactobacillus rhamnosus strain GG. Chemico-Biological Interactions. 128: 39–49.

Hernandez-Mendoza, A., Guzman-de-Pena, D. and Garcia, H.S. 2009. Key role of teichoic acids on aflatoxin B 1 binding by probiotic bacteria. J. Appl. Microbiol. 107: 395–403.

Kumar, A., Dhanshetty, M. and Banerjee, K. 2020. Development and validation of a method for direct analysis of aflatoxins in animal feeds by ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection. J. AOAC Int. 103: 940–945.

Lahtinen, S.J., Haskard, C.A., Ouwehand, A.C., Salminen, S.J. and Ahokas, J.T. 2004a. Binding of aflatoxin B 1 to cell wall components of Lactobacillus rhamnosus strain GG. Food Addit. and Contam. 21: 158–164.

Lee, Y.K., El-Nezami, H., Haskard, C.A., Gratz, S., Puong, K.Y., Salminen, S. and Mykkanen, H. 2003. Kinetics of adsorption and desorption of aflatoxin B1 by viable and nonviable bacteria. J. Food Prot. 66: 426–430.

Liew, W.P.P., Nurul-Adilah, Z., Than, L.T.L. and Mohd-Redzwan, S. 2018. The binding efficiency and interaction of Lactobacillus casei Shirota toward aflatoxin B1. Front. Microbiol. 9: 1503.

Liu, A., Zheng, Y., Liu, L., Chen, S., He, L., Ao, X., Yang, Y. and Liu, S. 2020. Decontamination of aflatoxins by lactic acid bacteria. Curr. Microbiol. 77: 3821–3830.

Peltonen, K., El-Nezami, H., Haskard, C., Ahokas, J. and Salminen, S. 2001. Aflatoxin B1 binding by dairy strains of lactic acid bacteria and Bifidobacteria. J. Dairy Sci. 84: 2152–2156.

Petrova, P., Arsov, A., Tsvetanova, F., Parvanova-Mancheva, T., Vasileva, E., Tsigoriyna, L. and Petrov, K. 2022. The complex role of lactic acid bacteria in food detoxification. Nutr. 14(10): 2038.

Shah, N. and Wu, X. 1999. Aflatoxin B1 binding abilities of probiotic bacteria. Biosci. Microflora18(1): 43-48.

Shotwell, O.L., Hesseltine, C.W., Stubblefield, R.D. and Sorenson, W.G. 1966. Production of aflatoxin on rice. Appl. Microbiol. 14(3): 425-428.

Cite this article

Ayana, P., Ajith, K.S., Ally, K., Dipu, M.T., Deepa Ananth and Binoj Chacko. 2025. Aflatoxin B1 detoxification potential of viable and killed Lactobacillus rhamnosus by in vitro method. J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 56 (2):343-347

Views
81
Downloads
24
Citations