JVAS announces awards - Four best research articles (one each from basic, production, para-clinical and clinical subjects) and one best short communication will be adjudged for awards each year!!!

Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences

Volume: 57 Issue: 1

  • Open Access
  • Research Article

Effect of storage conditions on sensory profile of soy-fortified shrikhand#

Dinker Singh1, K.G. Rashmi2, Vivek Koshta1, Srushty Omprakash Patil1 and Sapna Tomar1

1Department of Animal Reproduction, Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 3Department of Veterinary Anatomy, 4Department of Veterinary Physiology, College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Mannuthy, Thrissur-680 651,2Base Farm, Kolahalamedu, Idukki, Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Pookode, Wayanad, Kerala

Year: 2026, Page: 35-39, Doi: https://doi.org/10.51966/jvas.2026.57.1.35-39

Received: Sept. 9, 2025 Accepted: June 21, 2025 Published: March 31, 2026

Abstract

The enrichment of traditional dairy-based desserts such as shrikhand with soy protein represents a viable strategy for enhancing nutritional quality. Despite this potential, limited attention has been directed towards the influence of storage on the sensory profile of such fortified products. The present study systematically evaluated the temporal variations in sensory attributes of soy-fortified shrikhand during refrigerated storage. Experimental samples were prepared with 24.5% soy milk (SS) and compared against a control (CS), both stored at 4 ± 1 °C. Sensory evaluation was conducted at intervals of 0, 7, 14, 21, and 28 days by a trained panel, focusing on colour and appearance, flavour, texture, sweetness and overall acceptability of the product. Statistical analysis was performed using SAS software to determine significant changes over time. Results indicated that scores for colour and appearance were significantly higher (P<0.05) in control samples across all storage intervals. Flavour scores for both variants declined significantly (P<0.05) with prolonged storage, with intergroup differences becoming significant after 21 days. Texture scores for soyfortified shrikhand remained superior for the control sample throughout the storage period. However, sweetness and overall acceptability ratings of the fortified product were significantly lower than those of the control.

Keywords: soy milk, shrikhand, sensory evaluation, soy fortification

References

Amerine, M.A., Pongborn, R.H., & Roescler, E.B. 1965. Principles of sensory evaluation of food. Academic Press, New York, 338-339p.

Božanić, R., Lovković, S., & Jeličić, I. 2011. Optimising fermentation of soymilk with probiotic bacteria. Czech Journal of Food Sciences, 29(1), 51–56.

Kumar, D., Thakur, S. N., & Singh, D. (2014). Impact of banana puree on viability of probiotic soy yoghurt during storage. Journal of Pure and Applied Microbiology, 8(3), 2433–2439.

Kumar, S., Bhat, Z. F., & Kumar, P. (2011). Effect of apple pulp and Celosia argentea on the quality characteristics of shrikhand. American Journal of Food Technology, 6(9), 817–826.

Montgomery, D. C. (1997). Design and analysis of experiments (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Nigam, N., Singh, R., & Upadhayay, P. K. (2009). Incorporation of chakka by papaya pulp in the manufacture of shrikhand. Journal of Dairying, Foods and Home Sciences, 28(2), 115–118.

Patel, A. M., Dave, J. M., & Sannabhadti, S. S. (1993). Acid production by yogurt starters and their effect on proteolytic and lactose utilization in buffalo skim milk. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 20, 317–319.

Sarkar, S. (2008). Innovations in Indian fermented milk products: A review. Food Biotechnology, 22, 78–97.

SAS Institute Inc. (2006). SAS/STAT software: Changes and enhancements through release (Version 9.1). Author.

Singh, D., & Singh, J. (2014). Shrikhand: A delicious and healthful traditional Indian fermented dairy dessert. Trends in Biosciences, 7(3), 153–155.

Singh, D., Alam, T., Bhardwaj, A., & Singh, J. (2016). Optimisation of formulation for the manufacturing of soy fortified shrikhand. Indian Journal of Dairy Science, 69(6), 649–659.

Singh, D., Alam, T., Singh, P. P., Bhardwaj, A., & Masud, S. (2018). Efficacy of feeding soy fortified shrikhand as functional food on thyroid hormone (T3, T4) and thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) of rats. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 7(2), 671–674.

Singh, D., Singh, J., Kumar, S., & Verma, T. (2014). Microbiological evaluation of soy fortified shrikhand using response surface methodology. International Journal of Applied Biology and Pharmaceutical Technology, 5(1), 1–7.

Singh, D., & Rashmi, K. G. (2024). Storage-induced changes in the physico-chemical characteristics of soy-fortified shrikhand. Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 55(2), 247–255. https://doi.org/10.51966/jvas.2024.55.2.247-255

Snigdha, P. S., Singh, D., & Rashmi, K. G. (2023). Effect of vacuum packaging on the physico-chemical and shelf life attributes of herbal paneer spread. Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 54(4), 1052–1060. https://doi.org/10.51966/jvas.2023.54.4.1052-1060

Sonawane, V. M., Chavan, K. D., & Pawar, B. K. (2007). Effect of levels of strawberry pulp and sugar on chemical composition during storage of shrikhand. Journal of Dairy, Food and Home Sciences, 26(3–4), 153–158.

Verma, T. (2013). Process optimisation of soy fortified burfi and its nutritional impact on rats (Doctoral dissertation). Banaras Hindu University, India.

Verma, T., Singh, J., Niwas, R., Singh, D., Gautam, A. K., & Kumar, S. (2013). Impact of feeding soy enriched burfi on the internal body parts of the albino rats. International Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 3(6), 550–552.

Wolfe, B. E., Brashear, W. T., Desai, P., Oldfield, M. F., Botting, N. P., & Cassidy, A. (2003). Comparing the pharmacokinetics of daidzein and genistein using 13C-labeled tracers in premenopausal women. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 77, 411–419.

Cite this article

Singh, D., Rashmi, K.G., Koshta, V., Patil, S.O. & Tomar, S. (2026). Effect of storage conditions on sensory profile of soy-fortified shrikhand. Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences 57 (1), 35-39 https://doi.org/10.51966/jvas.2026.57.1.35-39

Views
13
Downloads
4
Citations