JVAS announces awards - Four best research articles (one each from basic, production, para-clinical and clinical subjects) and one best short communication will be adjudged for awards each year!!!

Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences

Volume: 56 Issue: 2

  • Open Access
  • Research Article

Evaluation of productive and reproductive performance of crossbred dairy cattle reared under conventional tie barn and loose housing system during summer season

G. Josline Naviya1, Manju Sasidharan1*, C. Balusami1, Surej Joseph Bunglavan2, Amritha Aravind3 and M.K. Aslam Muhammad4

1Department of Livestock Production Management,3Department of Animal Reproduction, Gynaecology and Obstetrics,
College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Mannuthy- 680 651, 2University Livestock Farm and Fodder Research
and Development Scheme, Mannuthy, 4Base Farm, Kolahalamedu, Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University,
Pookode, Wayanad, Kerala, India- 673 576

Year: 2025, Page: 325-331, Doi: https://doi.org/10.51966/jvas.2025.56.2.325-331

Received: Feb. 19, 2025 Accepted: April 25, 2025 Published: June 30, 2025

Abstract

The productive and reproductive performance of crossbred dairy cows kept at conventional tie barn and loose housing system were evaluated. The study was conducted in ULF & FRDS, Mannuthy. Twenty crossbred dairy cows in early lactation were selected and randomly divided into two groups. Group one consists of animals housed under loose housing system (T1) and group two consists of animals housed under conventional barn system (T2). Daily milk yield and meteorological data of ambient temperature and relative humidity of both housing systems were recorded. Reproductive parameters like onset of oestrus, intensity and duration of oestrus, service period and number of services per conception were recorded.The mean ambient temperature (ºC), relative humidity (%) and Temperature Humidity Index of loose house and tie-barns were 29.89±0.15 and 30.43±0.98, 66.95±3.27 and 78.07±3.31, 80.68±0.71 and 83.30±0.66 respectively and were significantly different between the two housing systems.The mean values of milk yield (kg) were 14.710±1.105 and 14.780±1.105 in T1 and T2 at the beginning of the study and were statistically similar. During the third month there was significant reduction in milk yield(kg) of T2 while the milk yield of T1 remained consistent. The milk yield (Kg) dropped significantly for both T1 and T2 during fourth month of lactation and was 12.160±0.801 and 9.980±0.801 respectively. The mean service period(days) was 121.20±35.808 for T1 and 157.00±72.414 for T2 and median values of duration of oestrus(h) were 24.00(78) and 12.00(36) and both differed significantly.Both of them differed significantly between the treatment groups. Onset of oestrus, intensity of oestrus and number of services per conception were similar for cows housed in both housing systems. The mean daily milk yield and reproductive parameters like service period and duration of oestrous of crossbred cattle were better in loose housing system. This study shows that loose housing system could be recommended for housing dairy cattle during summer.

Keywords: Housing system, summer season, milk production, reproduction, THI

References

Ammer, S., Lambertz, C., Von Soosten, D., Zimmer, K., Meyer, U., Dänicke, S. and Gauly, M., 2018. Impact of diet composition and temperature–humidity index on water and dry matter intake of high‐yielding dairy cows. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr.  102: 103-113.

Anderson, N.G. Cold housing and open housing—effects on health, management and production of dairy cattle. In: Saloniemi, H. (ed.), Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress in Animal Hygiene; 17th to 21st August, 1997, Helsinki. University of Helsinki, Department of Clinical Veterinary Sciences, Section of Animal Hygiene. pp. 481–487.

Azeez, 2014. Management of anoestrum in crossbred heifers and cows by hormonal induction of oestrus. PhD Thesis. Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Pookode, 147p.

Becker, C. A., Collier, R. J.  and Stone, A. E.  2020. Invited review: Physiological and behavioural effects of heat stress in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 103: 6751–6770.

Bewley, J.M., Robertson, L.M. and Eckelkamp, E.A. 2017. A 100-Year Review: Lactating dairy cattle housing management. J. Dairy Sci. 100: 10418-10431.

Biasato, I., D’Angelo, A., Bertone, I., Odore, R. and Bellino, C. 2019. Compost bedded-pack barn as an alternative housing system for dairy cattle in Italy: effects on animal health and welfare and milk and milk product quality. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 18: 1142–1153.

Bouraoui, R., Lahmar, M., Majdoub, A. and Belyea, R. 2002. The relationship of temperature-humidity index with milk production of dairy cows in a Mediterranean climate. Anim. Res51:479-491.

Cartwright, S., Schmied, J., Livernois, A. and Mallard, B.A. 2022. Physiological response to heat stress in immune phenotyped Canadian holstein dairy cattle in free-stall and tie-stall management systems. Front. Anim. Sci. 3: 1-11.

Collier, R.J., Dahl, G.E., VanBaale, M.J. 2006. Major advances associated with environmental effects on dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 89: 1244–53.

Gunn, K. M., Holly, M. A., Veith, T. L., Buda, A. R., Prasad, R., Rotz, C. A., Soder, K. J. and Stoner, A. M. K.  2019. Projected heat stress challenges and abatement opportunities for US milk production. PLoS One. 14: 1-21.

Harithalekshmi, V. and Ajithkumar, B. 2021. Intercomparison of seven Temperature-Humidity Index (THI) equations for assessing the impact of heat stress in relation to milk production to find out best THI for central zone of Kerala. Mausam. 72: 669-672.

Harman, J.L., Casella, G., Grohn, Y.T. 1996. The application of event-time regression techniques to the study of dairy cow interval-to-conception. Prev. Vet. Med. 26: 263–274.

Hussain, J., Roychoudhury, R., Das, G.C., Mili, D.C. and Goswami, R.N. 2012. Reproductive performance of dairy cows under field condition of Assam state. Indian J. Anim. Res. 46: 180-183.

Kowalski, R.M. 2003. Complaining, teasing, and other annoying behaviors. Yale University Press.197p.

Kumar, J., Singh, Y.P., Kumar, S., Singh, R., Kumar, R. and Kumar, P. 2015. Genetic analysis of reproductive performance of Frieswal cattle at Military Farm, Ambala. Vet. World. 8: 1032-1037.

Lambertz, C., Sanker, C., Gauly, M. 2014. Climatic effects on milk production traits and somatic cell score in lactating Holstein-Friesian cows in different housing systems. J. Dairy Sci. 97:319–29. 

Leso, L., Pellegrini, P. and Barbari, M. 2019. Effect of two housing systems on performance and longevity of dairy cows in Northern Italy. Agron. Res17: 574-581.

Lozano, R.R., Vásquez, C.G., Padilla, E.G. 2005. Effect of heat stress and its interaction with other management and productive variables on pregnancy rate in dairy cows in Aguascalientes, Mexico. Vet Max. 36: 245–60. 

Lyimo, Z., Nielen, M., Ouweltjes, W., Kruip, T.A.M., van Eerdenburg, F.J.C.M. 2000.  Relationship among estradiol, cortisol and intensity of estrous behaviour in dairy cattle. Theriogenology. 53: 1783–95.

Majewska, A. 2006. Effect of management system on the calving type and milk yield of Holstein-Friesians cows. Folia Univ. Agricult. Stetinensis. Zoot. 250: 127-138.

Ouellet, V., Cabrera, V.E., Fadul-Pacheco, L. and Charbonneau, E. 2019. The relationship between the number of consecutive days with heat stress and milk production of Holstein dairy cows raised in a humid continental climate. J. Dairy Sci102. 8537-8545.

Pennington and Devan, V. (2010). Heat stress in dairy cattle,  Agric Nat Resour. Availabl: https://www.uaex.edu/other Ares/publications/PDF/FSA-3040.pdf.

Perisic, V., Stosic, P. and Perisic, V. 2024. The influence of the housing system on well-being dairy cattle. In: Book of proceedings 2nd International Scientific Conference; 10th May, 2024, Sabac. Academy of Applied Studies. pp. 118-125.

Pollock, W.E. and Hurnik, J.F. 1979. Effect of two confinement systems on estrous and diestrous behavior in dairy cows. Can. J. Anim. Sci59: 799-803.

Sasidharan, M. 2023. Evaluation of calf rearing practices to develop new strategies for producing healthy replacement heifers. Phd Thesis, Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Pookode, 248p.

Sawa, A. and Bogucki, M. 2011. Effect of housing system and milk yield on cow fertility. Arch. Anim. Breed. 54: 249-256.

Schefers, J.M., Weigel, K.A., Rawson, C.L., Zwald, N.R. and Cook, N.B. 2010. Management practices associated with conception rate and service rate of lactating Holstein cows in large, commercial dairy herds. J. Dairy Sci. 93: 1459-1467.

Schnier, C., Hielm, S., Saloniemi, H.S. 2002. Comparison of the disease incidences of dairy cows kept in cold and warm loose-housing systems. Prev. Vet. Med. 53: 247–261.

Smid, A.M.C., Burnett, T.A., Madureira, A.M., McLellan, K.J., Wegner, C.S., von Keyserlingk, M.A. and Weary, D.M. 2024. Access to an outdoor open pack promotes estrus activity in dairy cows. PLoS One19: 1-12.

Snedecor, G.W. and Cochran, W.G. 1994. Statistical Methods. (8th Ed.). The Iowa State University press, Iowa, 564p.

Sood, P. and Nanda, A.S. 2006. Effect of lameness on estrous behavior in crossbred cows. Theriogenology 66: 1375-1380.

Tancin, V., Uhrincat, M., Kisac, P., Mihina, S., Tancinova, D., Hanus, A., Peskovicova, D. and Broucek, J. 2004. The effect of relocation on milk removal in primiparous dairy cows reared in different rearing systems during early postnatal period. J. Anim. Feed Sci. 13: 93-100.

Vtoryi, V., Vtoryi, S. and Ylyin, R. 2018. Investigations of temperature and humidity conditions in barn in winter. Jelgava. 23: 265-269.

West, J.W., Mullinix, B.G., Bernard, J.K. 2003. Effects of hot, humid weather on milk temperature, dry matter intake, and milk yield of lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci.86: 232–42.

Zdziarski, K., Grodzki, H., Nalecz-Tarwacka, T., Brzozowski, P., and Przyslucha, T. 2002. The impact of the housing system and the genotype of cows on their productive lifespan and lifetime milk yield. Sci. Pap. Breed. Rev. 62: 29-35.

Cite this article

Josline, N.G., Sasidharan, M., Balusami, C., Bunglavan, S.J., Amritha, A., Aslam, M.M.K. 2025. Evaluation of productive and reproductive performance of crossbred cattle reared under conventional tie barn and loose housing system during summer season. J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 56 (2):325-331

Views
46
Downloads
21
Citations