Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences

Volume: 55 Issue: 2

  • Open Access
  • Research Article

Socio-demographic profile and pattern of meat consumption of the consumers of Thrissur corporation

Aswathy Chandran1, Anu George1*, R.S. Jiji1, P. Reeja George1 and V.L. Gleeja2

1. Department of Veterinary and Animal Husbandry Extension

2. Department of Statistics

College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Mannuthy, Thrissur- 680 651 Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University Kerala, India

*Corresponding author:[email protected], Ph. 9447112165

Year: 2024, Page: 346-353, Doi: https://doi.org/10.51966/jvas.2024.55.2.346-353

Received: Oct. 12, 2023 Accepted: Jan. 6, 2024 Published: June 30, 2024

Abstract

The present study analysed the socio-demographic profile and the pattern of consumption of meat among consumers in the Thrissur Corporation area of Kerala state, India.A survey research design using a pretested structured schedule was employed among a sample of 150 meat consumers. The results revealed that majority of the respondents were female (65.30 per cent) and belonged to middle age group of 30-50 years (51.3 per cent). More than three-fourth of the consumers had a family size of up to four members (78 per cent).The annual income of majority of the respondents was within the range of one to ten lakh (66.70 per cent) and nearly 40.70 per cent of consumers were graduates.The results of this study indicated that all the respondents preferred to consume chicken when compared to chevon (39.3 per cent), beef (72.6 per cent), pork (37.3 per cent), or rabbit meat (4.7 per cent).Majority of the consumers consumed meat once or twice a week (73.3 per cent) and all the respondents assessed the quality of meat based on its colour. Most of them preferred to purchase meat from the local meat stalls (97.3per cent).Consumers reported that the reason for their preferred place of purchase was the availability of quality and fresh meat.

Keywords: Meat preference, meat type, meat quality, sensory quality

References

Abraham, J. and Kumar, S. 2021. Consumer preferences and marketing of readyto-eat meat products in Thrissur city of Kerala. Int. J. Livestock Res. 11: 16-21.

Arun, R. and Bhuvaneswari, R. 2019. Buying behaviour of meat consumption relates to food safety from North and South part of the Coimbatore city. Int. J. Recent Technol. Eng. 7: 429-433

Ayman, N. 2020. Consumption behaviour towards meat and meat products among the households in Srinagar city. MVSc thesis, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences & Technology , Kashmir, 24p.

Bafanda, R., Khandi, S., Minhaj, S. and Choudhary, F. 2017. Meat hygiene and associated health hazards awareness among consumers of Jammu District of Kashmir. Curr. J. Appl. Sci. Technol. 23: 1-16.

Chandirasekaran, V., Sureshkumar, S. and Rathod, K.S. 2021. Socio-economic status and meats preferences of consumers in Erode city of Tamil Nadu. Pharma Innovation J. 10: 388-391.

DAHD [Department of Animal Husbandry and Dairying], 2022. BasicAnimalHusbandry Statistics. Ministry of Fisheries, Animal Husbandry and Dairying, Government of India, 141p.

George, A., George, A. and Jacob, S.K. 2016. Production Statistics of Meat in Kerala. J. Dairy Vet. Anim. Res. 4: 155-157.

Grunert, K.G., Baadsgaard, A., Larsen, H.H. and Madsen, T.K. 1996. Market Orientation in Food and Agriculture. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston 253p.

Hall-Phillips, A. and Shah, P. 2017. Unclarity confusion and expiration date labels in the United States a consumer perspective. J. Retailing Consumer Serv. 35: 118-126.

Joseph, S.T., George, S., Vasudevan, V.N. and Sasidharan, M. 2021. Consumer preference for pork chops differing in fat thickness, lean thickness and lean colour. Pharma Innovation J. 10: 410- 416.

Kiran, M., Nagabhushan, C., Prabhu, N.K., Paramesha, S.C., Rajshekar, T., Praveen, M.P., Punitkumar, C., Puneetha, S.C., Kumar, R. and Rahul, Y. 2018. Consumption pattern, consumer attitude and consumer perception on meat quality and safety in Southern India. Int. Food Res. J. 25: 1026-1030.

Kotler, P., Armstrong G., Harris, C. and Piercy, N. 2017. Principles of Marketing (7th Ed.). Pearson Education Limited, United Kingdom, 700p.

Madhav, P.V. 2010. Mobile telephony in creating awareness on meat hygiene among urban consumers. MVSc thesis, Sri Venkateswara Veterinary University, Rajendranagar, 103p.

NFHS-5 [National Family Health Survey- 5]. 2019-21. Compendium of fact sheets INDIA and 14 states/UTs (Phase11). Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, New Delhi and International Institute for Population Sciences, Mumbai. Government of India, 116p. Available: https://sciresol.s3.us-east-2. amazonaws.com/srs-j/bujournals/GA/ pdf/Volume-10/issue-2/GA_v10i2_1.pdf [10th July 2023].

Olson, J.C. 1977.Price as an Informational Cue Effects on Product Evaluations. NorthHolland Publishers, New York, 286p.

Savale, S., Senthilkumar, R. and Sunanda, C. 2018. Socio economic profile of Ksheerasagaram beneficiaries of Wayanad district. J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 49: 48-52.

Sreeshma, M.P., Geetha, N., George, P.R., Sasidharan, M., George, S., Anil, K.S. and Sunanda, C. 2018. Analysis of the socio-economic profile of pet bird owners in Thrissur district. J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 49: 17-23.

Sunitha, W. 2019. Consumption pattern and consumer behaviour of meat consumption in rural consumer households in Vilavancode Taluk. Think India J. 22: 105-112.

Suresh, A. 2016. Consumers attitude towards meat consumption in India: insights from a survey in two metropolitan cities. Livestock Res. Rural Dev. 28: 1-7.

Testa, M.L., Grigioni, G., Panea, B. and Pavan, E. 2021. Colour and marbling as predictors of meat quality perception of Argentinian consumers. Foods. 10: 1-21.

Waghamare, R.N., Popalghat, H.K., Londhe, S.V., Deshmukh, V.V. and Khobe, V.V. 2021. An online survey of consumers of Maharashtra concerning the expected change in the meat and meat product business. J. Anim. Res. 11: 137-141.

Cite this article

Chandran, A., George, A., Jiji, R.S., George, R.P. and Gleeja, V.L. 2024. Socio-demographic profile and pattern of meat consumption of the consumers of Thrissur Corporation. J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 55(2):346-353

DOI: https://doi.org/10.51966/jvas.2024.55.2.346-353

Views
9
Downloads
4
Citations